Employee consent, surveillance on the table in PIPEDA reviewDeadline for public input on privacy legislation review is Sept. 7By Uyen Vu08/04/2006|Canadian HR Reporter|Last Updated: 08/13/2006 Should the federal government introduce a special category that would exempt workplace surveillance from privacy protection? Many organizations know they need consent when collecting, storing and using information, but should employee consent be a must if the information is needed to hire, manage or terminate the person? These will likely be two issues up for discussion in the fall when the first scheduled review of the federal privacy legislation gets under way. The legislation, which came into force in 2001 for federally regulated businesses, now applies to all commercial activity in provinces that don’t have a substantially similar law. Only Quebec, Alberta and British Columbia have privacy legislation that has been deemed to be substantially similar to the federal law. Ontario has a substantially similar law that applies only to the collection, use and disclosure of health information by health information custodians.Last month federal privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart released an outline of the issues on which she’s seeking public input. The deadline for input is Sept. 7. To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In Remember Me Forgot Password If you are a current Subscriber, please click here to set-up or update your login information.