HR Newswire sign up
Follow us on twitter
Search:

COMPENSATION & REWARDS
Apr 25, 2011

Pay equity alive and well in Ontario

Complacency may erode compliance — Ontario plans to find out
    

By Claudine Kapel

If your organization recently received a letter from the Ontario Pay Equity Commission regarding their Gender Wage Gap Program 2011, you know pay equity is alive and well in the province.

The Government of Ontario has decided it’s a good time to check on how pay equity is going. The Pay Equity Commission observes that the primary goal of its new Wage Gap Program is to collect sufficient data to enable it “to determine whether gender discrimination in pay practices is still prevalent.”

The commission notes that its “pilot” Wage Gap Program will “contact Ontario workplaces with more than 500 employees that have not recently been visited by a review officer.” It adds that the program “will likely be expanded to include small and mid-sized businesses.”

The challenge for many Ontario employers is that pay equity has not been top of mind in recent years. And the lack of attention could mean some pay equity issues have crept into the system, even for organizations that completed an initial filing when the provincial pay equity legislation was first introduced. If you don’t know what you don’t know, you may find yourself offside from a regulatory perspective.

Pay equity analysis is often not a core element of compensation program reviews. And the regular churn of staff over time can lead to a hazy corporate memory of how pay equity has been addressed in the past. For example, how many Ontario organizations today can easily find the documentation pertaining to their original pay equity posting from the 1990s?

Further, there is sometimes even haziness regarding who is actually covered by Ontario’s Pay Equity Act. Some smaller employers don’t realize that they become covered by the act once they hire their tenth employee.

Organizations that get audited by the commission will find themselves compelled to examine their pay practices. But a letter in the mail will likely cause fewer heart palpitations if you know where you stand and you have your house in order as a matter of practice.

If you’ve received a letter, you’ve seen that the commission is being quite rigorous with respect to the data it’s collecting – which encompasses the details of employees in Ontario, including job title, gender, pay as of Dec. 31, 2010, salary range and years of service. And the commission notes that if there appears to a gender wage gap, or if they do not receive the requested data by a specified deadline, then the employer will be referred to a review officer.

If you haven’t received a letter, that doesn’t mean you’re off the hook. The commission has been pretty clear that these are still early days for its Wage Gap Program.

To that end, some healthy introspection may be worthwhile. How would you fare if you were audited? When was the last time you tested your level of compliance? Are there any issues that need to be addressed?

Because when it comes to regulatory compliance, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Note: In my next blog May 2, I’ll take another look at women and pay in the article “Gender wage gap a complex issue.”

Claudine Kapel is principal of Kapel and Associates Inc., a Toronto-based human resources and communications consulting firm specializing in the design and implementation of compensation and total rewards programs. For more information, visit www.kapelandassociates.com.

    
COMMENT ON THIS BLOG POST
Headline for your comment (Optional)
Name (Required)    
Email Address (Required, will not be published)
Comment (Required)
All comments are moderated and usually appear within 24 hours of posting. Email address will not be published.
COMMENTS
An excellent way to drive business out of the country
Monday, April 25, 2011 1:51:00 PM by MaleMatters
What an excellent way to drive business out of the country!

In the United States, no legislation yet has closed the gender wage gap — not the 1963 Equal Pay for Equal Work Act, not Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, not the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act, not the 1991 amendments to Title VII, not affirmative action, not diversity, not the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, not the countless state and local laws and regulations, not the horde of overseers at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission… nor would the Paycheck Fairness Act work.

That's because pay-equity advocates, at no small financial cost to taxpayers and the economy, continue to overlook the effects of this female and male behavior:

Despite the 40-year-old demand for women's equal pay, millions of wives still choose to have no pay at all. In fact, according to Dr. Scott Haltzman, author of "The Secrets of Happily Married Women," stay-at-home wives, including the childless who represent an estimated 10 per cent, constitute a growing niche.

"In the past few years,” he says in a CNN report at http://tinyurl.com/6reowj, “many women who are well educated and trained for career tracks have decided instead to stay at home.” (“Census Bureau data show that 5.6 million mothers stayed home with their children in 2005, about 1.2 million more than did so a decade earlier....” at http://tinyurl.com/qqkaka.

If more women are staying at home, perhaps it's because feminists and the media have told women for years that female workers are paid less than men in the same jobs — so why bother working if they're going to be penalized and humiliated for being a woman.)

As full-time mothers or homemakers, stay-at-home wives earn zero. How can they afford to do this while in many cases living in luxury? Because they're supported by their husband.

Both feminists and the media ignore what this obviously implies: If millions of wives are able to accept no wages and live as well as their husbands, millions of other wives are able to accept low wages, refuse overtime and promotions, work part-time instead of full-time (“According to a 2009 UK study by Cristina Odone for the Centre for Policy Studies, only 12 per cent of the 4,690 women surveyed wanted to work full time.” http://bit.ly/ihc0tl), take more unpaid days off, avoid uncomfortable wage-bargaining (http://tinyurl.com/45ecy7p) — all of which lower women's average pay.

They are able to do this because they are supported, or anticipate being supported, by a husband who must earn more than if he'd chosen never to marry. (Still, even many men who shun marriage, unlike women, feel their self worth is tied to their net worth.) This is how men help create the wage gap. If the roles were reversed so men raised the children and women raised the income, men would average lower pay than women.

See “A Response to the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act” at http://tinyurl.com/pvbrcu