HR Newswire sign up
Follow us on twitter
Search:

Jun 11, 2012

Warming up to flex time

As the thermometer rises, so should employers’ (and managers’) tolerance for flex time
    

By Todd Humber

Summer in Canada is too short. At least, it feels far too short and perception, as we all know, is reality.

When the mercury rises, so too does the desire for employees to get outside and enjoy the sunshine. Staff gaze longingly out the window when there’s not a cloud in the sky and the thermometer is pushing 30C.

To assist in fighting this natural distraction, many organizations offer summer perks. Employees, clearly, want flexibility in their schedules, especially during the summer months. In fact, flexible schedules and leaving work early on Fridays are the most coveted summer perks, according to a survey of 377 workers conducted by OfficeTeam.

Of course, not every organization can jump on the flex-time bandwagon. When I was in university, I spent my summers toiling on the line at Chrysler’s Windsor Assembly Plant in Windsor, Ont., building minivans.

It was a great summer job but, when the line started rolling, workers had to be at their stations, tools in hand and ready to go. Flex work schedules in that environment would be a disaster.

But for many workers, coming in early and leaving early (or staying late to bank hours) is feasible. But employers haven’t exactly caught flex-time fever. Less than one-quarter (23 per cent) of the 150 HR managers surveyed by OfficeTeam said their company offers flex schedules during the summer, and 20 per cent said staff are allowed to leave early on Fridays.

It’s surprising flex time hasn’t caught on to a greater degree than that. After all, flex time costs nothing and the benefits are huge.

Giving employees the freedom to shift their start time makes for happy, productive employees. They still get their work done, yet can make it home in time to take their kids to soccer. Or they can get a jump on the weekend. Or perhaps just have more time to run errands and more time to spend at home.

Organizations, and managers in particular, have to abandon the notion that workers have to be sitting in their chairs, at a specific time and under the thumb of supervision, in order to be productive. As more companies adopt flexible philosophies – a trend that is only going to gain steam – more organizations will have to jump on the bandwagon.

But merely jumping on the bandwagon isn’t enough. All managers and supervisors need to be trained on the benefits of flex time. Too many organizations that have embraced flex time on a corporate level still face pockets of resistance from managers who don’t buy into the philosophy.

That can breed resentment as employees who report to different managers have very different experiences. Being forced to punch the clock and sit in your cubicle while your neighbor, who has a more progressive manager, is able to come and go via flex time, is a recipe for disengagement.

And disengagement is not a recipe employers should be grilling up during the all-too-brief summer months.

Todd Humber is the managing editor of Canadian HR Reporter, the national journal of human resource management. He can be reached at todd.humber@thomsonreuters.com.

© Copyright Canadian HR Reporter, Thomson Reuters Canada Limited. All rights reserved.
    
COMMENT ON THIS BLOG POST
Headline for your comment (Optional)
Name (Required)    
Email Address (Required, will not be published)
Comment (Required)
All comments are moderated and usually appear within 24 hours of posting. Email address will not be published.
COMMENTS
The issue is beyond just flextime
Monday, June 25, 2012 3:51:00 PM by Mr. Bean
Good blog, but I think the focus should be on changing the number of hours Canadians work year round. Our country has one of the fewest holidays in the world. If you compare us to Italy and France our statutory holidays don't even come close! Most countries give their citizens over 1 month off and even 2 months off annually. And we only provide our citizens with 9 stat holidays? Canadians are over worked. The issue of flex time isn't even scratching the surface of the problem. What needs more attention is why are Canadians working longer hours annually than the rest of the world?? And yet is our economy any more protected as a result? The answer is no. It's time to change the policy around the hours of work we dedicate overall and provide more days off throughout the year - at least more than double what it currently is today.
FLEX TIME
Friday, June 15, 2012 9:45:00 AM by Jezzee
Flex time is a great staff motivation factor wherein an employee can work late 4 days and leave early on Fridays to go to the cottage, do grocery shopping beating the weekend crowds in the stores or simply to enjoy a 2 1/2 day weekend. Employers who had implemented this shift for sure will entice a lot of job applicants in the future!

Enjoy the summer!

Jezzee
Leaders have to shift in thinking
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 4:55:00 PM by Angelo Pesce
There is no question that not all operations lend themselves to flex time. But for flex time to take hold leaders have to have a major shift in thinking. Most still believe that time at work equals productivity and if we can't see the employee then he/she is not productive. For this paradigm shift to take place leaders have to shift to outputs. Clearly establish an appropriate output and let the people figure it out. But until this shift in thinking takes place flex time will always seem as a loss of productivity. It is a shame because, as you suggest there is so much to be gained by trusting employees to produce and still have flexibility and not just in the summer.

Angelo