HR Newswire sign up
Follow us on twitter
Search:

Mar 11, 2013

How not to handle a sexual harassment charge

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford does something no leader should ever do in response to an allegation
    

By Todd Humber

Local politics in any city can be a bit of a circus act. I know — city council was my beat in my early days as a journalist.

But local government in Toronto has elevated the three ring act to new heights. To say that the mayor’s office in Canada’s largest city has been controversial since Mayor Rob Ford was elected is an understatement.

Pick a controversy — there’s a good chance the mayor’s office has dealt with it. Depending on what side of the political spectrum you fall, Toronto’s right-wing mayor is either a bumbling idiot or a saviour who is finally respecting taxpayer dollars after years of waste.

But regardless of where you sit on said spectrum, and particularly through an HR lens, the way Ford has reacted to an allegation of sexual harassment against him is problematic.

Here’s the Reader’s Digest version of events: Last Thursday, Ford attended a party held by a Jewish political group. In attendance was Sarah Thomson, a well-known figure in Toronto and someone who ran against Ford for the mayor’s seat in the last election.

Thomson and Ford posed for a photo at the event, and she alleged — via a Facebook post — that Ford groped her and made suggestive comments.

One can question the wisdom of laying such a charge via social media, but in an age where anyone can post anything to a mass audience at any time, it’s a hardly surprising — though regrettable — knee-jerk reaction.

But one can’t question the wisdom of Ford’s inappropriate response. Here’s what he said on a radio show he regularly hosts: “I’ve always said I don’t know if she’s playing with a full deck.”

Denying the accusation is one thing. At the moment, only two people really know what happened — Ford and Thomson — and they’re telling different stories. It’s impossible to objectively know who is telling the truth.

But, in a sexual harassment allegation, it’s never a smart move to try to sway opinion by questioning the accuser’s sanity. Politics is a different animal than corporate life, but that’s a tactic that could lead to a pretty expensive judgment if a CEO or business leader tried it out.

In a statement to the media, also posted on Facebook, Thomson said the following in response:

“Decades ago, powerful men who sexually assaulted women would call them ‘hysterical’ or ‘crazy’ to debase their credibility. It pushed many assaulted women into silence. Today Mayor Ford stated he wondered if I was ‘playing with a full deck’ to try to discredit me. He will not push me in to silence and I hope his accusations do not reignite the old fears that once silenced women.”

Charges of sexual harassment should never be taken lightly. It requires a full investigation into the alleged wrongdoing, sometimes by third-party professionals.

But the last reaction any leader should have is to try and discredit the accuser. There’s nothing wrong with strongly denying it happened, if that’s the case, or laying out a solid case in your defense.

But name calling? That’s not even acceptable on the playground.

Todd Humber is the managing editor of Canadian HR Reporter, the national journal of human resource management. He can be reached at todd.humber@thomsonreuters.com or visit www.hrreporter.com for more information.

© Copyright Canadian HR Reporter, Thomson Reuters Canada Limited. All rights reserved.
    
COMMENT ON THIS BLOG POST
Headline for your comment (Optional)
Name (Required)    
Email Address (Required, will not be published)
Comment (Required)
All comments are moderated and usually appear within 24 hours of posting. Email address will not be published.
COMMENTS
Re: ron banerjee
Friday, March 15, 2013 8:50:00 AM by Mr. Objective
Ron - who are you to say that Rob Ford is a living saint? Are you living with him? Also, the fact that you would react to an accusation by throwing chairs just shows how guilty you are - an innocent person would not resort to such irrationality. Your reaction to an accusation must be rational.
Yes, groping is sexual assault
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:10:00 PM
People are so ignorant. Unwanted sexual contact is indeed sexual assault and that does not trivialize rape. That is a ridiculous comment.
And Rob Ford is pretty far from sainthood. As a person in a public role, he should be taking the high road and it is never appropriate to attack the "victim". Ford is not a victim - he sought public office and his behaviour is a never-ending display if inappropriate conduct for any respectable citizen, let alone the mayor of a major city.
He is an embarrassment and we are the victims.
Sarah Thomson does seem off base
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:09:00 AM
I don't like Rob Ford but you have to sympathize with him. Sarah Thomson has also accused him of drug use based on her Internet research. She's quoted in the Toronto Star as saying: “I don’t have actual proof, it’s just based on the symptoms,” Thomson said. “And the symptoms I’ve read on cocaine seem to fit.”
And is this alleged "butt grabbing" correctly to be called "sexual assault" as she terms it? Doesn't using that term downplay the seriousness of rape? And if it is sexual assault why did she want her assistant to see if Ford would do it to her as well, as is alleged by other councellors at the event? Why would she want to set another woman up for sexual assault to get "evidence" on Ford.
Leaders must take high road
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 9:25:00 AM by Todd Humber
My point was simply that someone in a leadership position — be it the Mayor, a CEO or some other executive — needs to take the high road when faced with an accusation like this. One of the unfortunate facts of being in a position of power is that people will come at you. Being accused of sexual assault should never be taken lightly or shrugged off, but there are much better and effective ways of handling it than leveling accusations regarding your accuser’s sanity.

Leaders like Rob Ford need to stay above the fray. It doesn’t mean he can’t make a strong, effective denial — but he can certainly do that without resorting to name calling.

I don’t see this a “right” or “left” issue. It’s just a question of how someone in a position of power should react when faced with such an accusation.
STOP victimizing the victim (victim=Rob Ford)
Monday, March 11, 2013 7:20:00 PM by ron banerjee
Todd,will you STOP telling ROB FORD how he 'should' or 'should not' have reacted to this. For heaven's sake, the man was accused of serious misdeeds which can destroy his career, reputation, marriage and family.... And all you can comment on whether his reaction was correct. This man is a living saint, cuz if I was accused falsely in this way I would have gone berserk and started screaming and throwing chairs thru the windows of City Hall! Sheesh, these leftist journalists .. what on earth are they thinking before they write this stuff??
Social media has become the new trier of fact...
Monday, March 11, 2013 12:10:00 PM by Brian Knowler
Todd - nicely done. Your article points out an all too prevalent phenomenon of the 21st century. Far, far too many people are turning to social media as their outlet of choice for airing grievances. It's one thing if you want to complain about a news story or your favorite hockey team blowing a game or how much the newest Call of Duty sucks.

It's quite another to allege that the mayor of Toronto's biggest city sexually assaulted you at a party, and then to take to the same medium to decry your accuser as having psychological issues.

Whatever happened to third-party investigations? From a policing point of view, I have seen far too many cases where valuable time (and confidential information) has been lost due to complainants tweeting, Facebooking, or blogging before even turning to police or other formal methods of complaint.

The problem is that both media and popular culture feed on social media 'wars' - they're easy to follow and fill a newscast or call in show. And it's not going away any time soon.

Regardless of who's 'right' in this case, they have both conducted themselves as less than befitting of someone who claims to have the best interests of their city and the public at heart.