HR Newswire sign up
Follow us on twitter
Search:

HR POLICIES & PRACTICES
Oct 30, 2012

Bullying and harassment: Still a problem in workplaces

Suggestions for employers in dealing with workplace bullying
    

By Brian Kreissl

It’s been more than two years since Bill 168 came into force in Ontario. The bill, which amended the Occupational Health and Safety Act by requiring employers in Ontario to put policies and programs into place dealing with workplace violence and harassment, came into force on June 15, 2010.

The legislation requires employers to conduct violence risk assessments, deal with the spillover effects of domestic violence and warn employees about individuals with a history of violence. But perhaps most importantly, for the first time — in Ontario at least — legislation now bans workplace harassment based on reasons other than those amounting to prohibited grounds of discrimination under human rights legislation.

Yet, in spite of legislation like Bill 168 and other forms of redress under the common law, bullying and harassment remain serious problems in the workplace. Over the past few weeks, I've received numerous press releases and articles on this topic — indicating it’s an issue that is still top of mind for many employers, HR professionals and employees.

Most of us have probably been a victim of workplace bullying at some point. I know I have experienced mild bullying in a couple of previous jobs, so I hate to think what people experiencing severe bullying go through.

But even mild bullying masked as “strong management” can make you feel powerless. You start to really dislike going into work. Sunday nights especially fill you with dread for the coming week.

While bullying can be perpetrated by anyone in a workplace — including superiors, peers, customers or even subordinates — often it seems workplace bullies are in some sort of position of power or authority over their victims. This type of behaviour is often perpetrated under the guise of trying to improve productivity or performance.

According to Lisa Barrow, assistant professor at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ont., and author of the book In Darkness, Light Dawns: Exposing Workplace Bullying, 47 per cent of employees have been publicly humiliated by their colleagues or superiors. Forty-two per cent of bullied employees are teased regularly, and 29 per cent experience anxiety and depression. When things get bad enough, seven per cent of bullied employees will even consider suicide or homicide as viable options.

Perhaps because of ongoing fears about economic uncertainty and the possibility of job losses, bullying still seems to be a major problem in many workplaces. Many people just aren’t getting the message bullying won’t be tolerated. So what can organizations do about it?

Recommendations for employers

According to Rick Lash and Andrea Plotnick of the consulting firm Hay Group, there are four things employers should do to combat bullying:

•Create an environment where it’s safe to speak up about bullying.

•Encourage employees to document bad behaviour.

•Don’t be afraid to call out managers for bullying behaviour, even when they’re delivering “good results.”

•Coach and train leaders to have flexible leadership styles and be able to provide vision and coaching, while also holding employees accountable and managing their performance.

Beyond that, simply creating a culture of respect is important. Many organizations pay lip service to the idea, but managers and employees need to truly understand the importance of respecting all employees and their thoughts, opinions and beliefs.

Bullying behaviour — such as deliberately setting employees up for failure, shouting, abusive or profane language, ridiculing or humiliating an individual, character assassination, gossip and innuendo, social isolation or constantly taking credit for someone else’s work — should never be tolerated.

It’s also important to examine the way individuals are motivated, trained and incented within the organization. Performance management and compensation programs need to consider the way results are achieved as well as the results themselves.

Managers need to set reasonable expectations and provide proper context for performance management. Employees need to know what’s expected of them and what superior performance actually looks like.

Aside from any legislative requirements, organizations need to develop and enforce policies and programs dealing with bullying and harassment. And in order to have any teeth, such policies need to spell out disciplinary sanctions and outline enforcement and complaint mechanisms in the event of alleged incidents of bullying and harassment.

Brian Kreissl is the managing editor of Consult Carswell. He is also co-author of the Bill 168 Implementation Guide, published by Carswell. Brian can be reached at brian.kreissl@thomsonreuters.com. For more information, visit www.consultcarswell.com.  

© Copyright Canadian HR Reporter, Thomson Reuters Canada Limited. All rights reserved.
    
COMMENT ON THIS BLOG POST
Headline for your comment (Optional)
Name (Required)    
Email Address (Required, will not be published)
Comment (Required)
All comments are moderated and usually appear within 24 hours of posting. Email address will not be published.
COMMENTS
Can a company be socially responsible and not protect employees against workplace harassment?
Friday, May 10, 2013 5:04:00 PM
Bill 168 seems to be a very important contributor to creating a better work place. Workplace harassment is a real problem unless proper policies are in place. Let's hope some accountability can take hold. Public relations about social responsibility sometimes seems to trump the reality of what is happening in the work place.
HR Role in Physical Aggression
Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:42:00 PM
So what do you think of a company that denies there was "inappropriate behaviour" (physical aggression, bullying) by an HR employee when, in fact, there was? Does this act of denial mean they think it's OK to become physically aggressive? It certainly does to me, especially when a previous HR employee became violent.
Bully & Other Forms of Workplace Violence Are Preventable
Thursday, November 01, 2012 10:34:00 PM by Felix P. Nater, CSC
Eighteen years of experience Combating Workplace Violence shows that denial runs rampant when it comes to accepting responsibility and accountability for investigating allegations. Typically, the Boss, is the reason why the bully survives, there's no effort to substantiate employee allegations or the behavior is rationalized. There seems to be a rallying cry around the bully and a mobbing mentality directed at the complainant. What makes the bully so adept at staying undetected or unprosecuted is his chameleon ways. If and when confronted, the bully never reveals his predatory characteristics to superiors or contemporaries just to those he/she can exercise influence and control over. The Boss is the last person to know simply because they are being manipulated, are unaware of the allegations or are in denial. The lack of commitment to ferret fact from fiction places the burden of proof on the complainant. Reporting is the bully's perfect opportunity to refute & controvert allegations in building value points that allows him to exacts his vengeance with impunity. That he's never held to account or that there's never any formal investigation, creates the impression that he's impervious and untouchable. This is how the bully exercises control and influence in creating the perception that the complainant has no recourse. The sad reality is that bullying leads to spontaneous retaliation by the complainant or over reaction under stressful conditions.

An aggressive solution is to establish a zero-based incident tolerance that results in a thorough incident assessment and evaluation of the findings and to establish acceptable boundaries and parameters in managing and defining acceptable behavior. To signify a management commitment, the organizational head must issue a zero-based tolerance statement outlining accountability and responsibilities along with strict reporting, monitoring, tracking and assessment & evaluation policy. Until senior management defines a commitment to workplace violence prevention through accountable based outcomes with consequences, the bully and workplace predator will seem empowered to continue until he or she is stopped. Ontario Bill 168 has promise but not without proactive intervention.

Bullying - Professionally Unacceptable
Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:13:00 AM by Maxwell Pinto
Targets, victims and witnesses of bullying have a few avenues to pursue (as compared with victims of sexual harassment) when subject to repeated and obvious acts of aggression, spreading malicious rumours, excluding someone socially or from certain projects, undermining or impeding a person’s work or opinions, insulting a person’s habits, attitudes, or private life and intruding upon a person’s privacy. Others include being rude or belligerent, destroying property, assaulting an individual, or setting impossible deadlines. Although bullying is recognized as detrimental to occupational health, there is little political or corporate interest in stopping it.

In schoolyard bullying, the bullies are children, whose behaviour is controlled by the leaders, i.e. the school administration. In workplace bullying, however, the bullies are often the leaders themselves, i.e., the managers and supervisors. Therefore, reporting a bully to the HR dept, for example, may expose the target/victim to the risk of even more bullying, slower career advancement, or even termination, on the grounds of being a “troublemaker!”.

Workplace bullying has severe consequences, including reduced effectiveness and high employee turnover. An employee who suffers any physical or psychiatric injury as a result of workplace bullying can confront the bully, report the bully to the HR department or to the trade union, if any, or bring a claim of negligence and/or a personal injury claim against both the employer and the abusive employee as joint respondents in the claim. If the law does not persuade employers to deal with workplace bullying, the economic reality will persuade them. Training sessions can help when combined with a confidential reporting structure, but it is difficult to alter the basic nature of some individuals, who may need counselling.

Maxwell Pinto, Business Author
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=sr_nr_i_1?rh=k%3Amaxwell+pinto%2Ci%3Adigital-text&keywords=maxwell+pinto&ie=UTF8&qid=1323793453