Publisher's Desk|Canadian HR Law|HR Policies & Practices|Employment Law|The C-Suite|HR Guest Blog|The Corner Office

Scheming to get rid of a worker costs employer nearly $1 million

Jury gives B.C. man largest award of punitive damages in Canadian employment law history

By Stuart Rudner

A recent decision arising out of a case in Prince George, B.C. has made headlines as the case, decided by a jury, resulted in a damages award of about $809,000.

Notably, $573,000 of that award were punitive damages — this is the largest award of punitive damages in an employment law matter in Canadian history. 

Readers will recall the Keays v. Honda Canada Inc. case of a few years ago in which the trial judge awarded $500,000 in punitive damages as a result of his finding that Honda engaged in conduct worthy of punishment. That award dwarfed previous awards of punitive damages. But it was reduced to $100,000 by the Ontario Court of Appeal and then wiped out altogether by the Supreme Court of Canada.

In Higginson v. Babine Forest Products Ltd., the evidence showed the company had made a decision to try to get rid of an employee who had been on the job for 34 years. Initially, the company engaged in efforts to make Higginson’s job so miserable he would have no choice but to resign.

When this failed, the company concocted allegations of misconduct and alleged it had just cause for dismissal. The jury did not buy it, and found in favour of Higginson.  In addition to damages arising out of wrongful dismissal, he was awarded almost $600,000 in punitive damages. When one factors in damages, interest and legal costs, the matter is likely to have cost the company about $1 million.

The case provides a good example of how not to get rid of an employee. I have occasionally been consulted by clients who raise the possibility of avoiding dismissal obligations by making an employee’s life miserable so they will quit, or by attempting to build a case for summary dismissal.

The employer in this case attempted both, and went even further by trying to create just cause for dismissal where none existed. Clearly, this strategy cost the company far more than simply dismissing the employee by providing notice or payment in lieu thereof would have.

As an aside, another mistake I occasionally see on the part of employers is the decision to offer an employee the opportunity to resign, rather than be dismissed for cause. Often, this is done based upon the mistaken belief doing so will allow the employee to obtain employment insurance benefits. However, an employee that resigns will generally be ineligible for such benefits, as they will be if they are found to have engaged in wilful misconduct. 

This occurred in the Vernon v. British Columbia (Ministry of Housing and Social Development – Liquor Distribution Branch) case which was reviewed in my Feb. 14, 2012, post. In addition to a multitude of other mistakes, after determining there was just cause for dismissal the company offered Vernon the opportunity to resign, at which point she would be provided with a letter of reference.  As the court stated,

"If Ms. Vernon’s conduct was sufficiently serious that the Liquor Distribution Branch had the right to summarily dismiss her without notice, it would have been improper for the Liquor Distribution Branch to give her a reference letter.  To offer a reference letter as a carrot to resign is, in my opinion, conduct which is properly the subject matter of retribution, deterrence and denunciation."

The bottom line is that as an employer, if you want to dismiss an employee but do not have just cause, you should abide by your obligations with respect to notice or payment in lieu thereof.  And if you do have just cause, don’t offer to accept the employee’s resignation in exchange for a positive letter of reference.

Stuart Rudner is a partner in the Labour & Employment Law Group of Miller Thomson LLP, a national law firm. He provides clients with strategic advice regarding all aspects of the employment relationship, and represents them before courts, mediators and tribunals. He is author of You’re Fired: Just Cause for Dismissal in Canada, published by Carswell. He can be reached at (905) 415-6767 or srudner@millerthomson.com. You can also follow him on Twitter @CanadianHRLaw and join his Canadian Employment Law Group on LinkedIn.

Stuart Rudner

Stuart Rudner, Employment Lawyer and MediatorStuart Rudner is the founder of Rudner Law (RudnerLaw.ca), a firm specializing in Employment Law and Mediation. He can be reached at stuart@rudnerlaw.ca, (416) 864-8500 or (905) 209-6999, and you can follow on Twitter @CanadianHRLaw.
CLICK TO COMMENT ON THIS BLOG POST
(Required)
(Required, will not be published)
(Required)
All comments are moderated and usually appear within 24 hours of posting. Email address will not be published.
2 Comments
  • How do I negotiate(settle) with my LTD Provider after being fired from my job,
    Monday, August 13, 2012 1:23:00 PM by Stuart Rudner
    Anida, as you said, you should consult with counsel and obtain proper advice. If you need assistance finding a lawyer, please contact me directly at srudner@millerthomson.com.