Publisher's Desk|Canadian HR Law|HR Policies & Practices|Employment Law|The C-Suite|HR Guest Blog

Asbestos: Canada’s shame

Quebec’s decision to give $58 million loan guarantee to reopen mine not the example Canada should be setting

By Todd Humber

They’re applauding in a small town in Quebec, and they’re getting sick and dying in India.

The provincial government’s decision to provide a $58 million loan guarantee to Montreal-based Balcorp to reopen the Jeffrey Mine in Asbestos, Que., is not the example Canada should be setting when it comes to workplace health and safety.

How’s this for a stark contrast? Sitting next to the daily newspapers on my desk with headlines of Quebec’s investment in asbestos mining is marketing material for Canada’s Safest Employers awards. The annual awards, which will be handed out in September by Canadian Occupational Safety (COS) magazine (, recognize employers with exceptional workplace health and safety records and programs.

A safe workplace is a right, not a privilege. While we haven’t perfected the art of prevention yet, and everyone agrees one death or injury is too many, everybody — including employers, employees and government — is trying to ensure workers make it home safe.

Numerous Canadian jurisdictions have even put bullying and psychological harassment on the workplace violence agenda (including Quebec, which led the charge on this front). It’s the right thing to do for workers, and it’s a boon for business — injured workers, whether it’s a physical or mental ailment, are very bad for the bottom line.

It’s hard to reconcile all this progressive, enlightened thinking with a decision to prop up an asbestos industry that is not only failing (it couldn’t reopen without the loan guarantees) but is exposing vulnerable workers in developing countries to cancer.

Who can forget that CBC video from a few years ago that showed workers in India handling asbestos without protection, flinging it around with their bare hands while wearing only bandanas to cover their mouths and noses?

It’s hard to find anybody, outside of the residents of the job-starved town, in favour of restarting the mine. Even the province’s own public health doctors see the folly of the scheme — “(Premier Jean Charest) is relaunching the exploitation of an extremely dangerous material that will cause the suffering and death of thousands of people in poor countries, at only marginal benefit to a desperate community,” Yv Bonnier Viger, head of Quebec’s association of public health specialists, told the Globe and Mail.

About 55 countries have banned asbestos entirely. We know the health effects of exposure  — workers’ compensation boards across the country are dealing with the fallout and will continue to do so for decades to come.

Asbestos remains popular in some quarters because of its strength and resistance to fire, heat, electrical and chemical damage. Wouldn’t we be far better off to take that $58 million (and maybe more) and put it into researching, developing and producing a safe substitute?

Then we could open a factory in Asbestos that safely employs local workers and doesn’t condemn unwitting victims on the other side of the globe to an early death.

Todd Humber is the managing editor of Canadian HR Reporter, the national journal of human resource management. He can be reached at 

© Copyright Canadian HR Reporter, Thomson Reuters Canada Limited. All rights reserved.

Todd Humber

Todd Humber is the publisher and editor-in-chief of Canadian HR Reporter, the national journal of human resource management. Follow him on Twitter @ToddHumber
(Required, will not be published)
All comments are moderated and usually appear within 24 hours of posting. Email address will not be published.
1 Comment