Union’s scope claim not supported by context

The employer and the union disagreed over whether a letter of commitment from the airline covered all types of aircraft. The arbitrator found that the language in the letter was specific and excluded some aircraft.

As part of its restructuring, an airline acquired a quantity of propeller aircraft to fly the “feeder” service routes operated by its regional subsidiary under a separate collective agreement.

To read the full story, login below.

Not a subscriber?

Start your subscription today!