While it’s hard to believe slavery still exists today, there are actually almost 21 million victims of forced labour worldwide, generating $190 billion in illegal profits per year, according to the International Labour Organization.
As a result, the Thomson Reuters Foundation in London, U.K., has launched the Stop Slavery Award to recognize businesses that have excelled in efforts to try to eradicate forced labour from their supply chains.
It’s a business-friendly initiative, according to Thomson Reuters Foundation CEO Monique Villa, founder of the prize.
“The Stop Slavery Award is about rewarding the courage of those businesses that have gone above and beyond to ensure their revenue is not tainted by modern-day slavery. At a time when shareholders are increasingly vigilant over the socio-economic footprint of many corporations, the award is an important contribution to ensure that the fight against slavery is perceived both as a human rights priority and a business imperative.”
The awards criteria highlight best practices in corporate commitment and reporting, performance measurement, business partner engagement, risk assessment and investigation and remediation.
These kinds of awards make sense because rewarding heroes is just as important as exposing villains, said Terry Fitzpatrick, director of communications at Free the Slaves in Washington, D.C.
“We want people who are breaking new ground and are trailblazing in this area and showing it isn’t impossible” he said.
“This kind of business recognition program, from an independent authority... is really welcome because it’s vetted — it isn’t just a company’s marketing but this is actually an outside entity that will look at who is being nominated and checking them out.”
Of course, it’s unfortunate the awards even need to exist.
“It’s a misperception that slavery ever ended — it was outlawed but it was never really eradicated and it’s always existed and persisted in some form in different places throughout the world,” said Fitzpatrick.
There have been a couple of economic, global trends that have helped give slavery a bit of a global comeback, he said.
“In many places, the population has grown faster than the economy and that leaves people vulnerable to exploitation and to having to migrate for work… Another trend that’s happened is that a lot of manufacturing has moved from countries with strong labour laws that are well-enforced to countries that have weaker labour laws that aren’t enforced.”
So if a company moves its manufacturing to a place where slavery is endemic and labour inspection is non-existent, easily corruptible or just not stringent, that’s when it can happen, said Fitzpatrick.
“There could be two people doing the same job, say, in a garment manufacturing company in Bangladesh and one is in slavery and other isn’t. So it isn’t necessarily the job, it’s how you came to do that job and whether you can get out of that job and whether you’re getting paid for that job that makes it slavery, and not just employment or exploitative employment.”
It’s not just an issue that happens internationally, he said. For example, the United States attorneys office recently found out janitorial crews working at a big box store were part of a trafficking ring from the Ukraine, into Mexico and then the U.S.
Modern day slaves often go unnoticed, said Villa.
“There is slavery hidden in the food, electronics and clothes we consume... there are more people trapped in modern day slavery today that at any given point in history.”
And global outsourcing makes it easier for employers to take advantage of vulnerable workers, and harder for corporations to monitor and regulate the working conditions of those at the bottom of their supply chain, she said.
One of the reasons slavery is an issue is it goes underreported far too often, said Sean Morris, federal human capital leader at Deloitte in Arlington, Vir.
“It’s in the shadows, particularly the labour side of it, so people don’t realize it’s there. On the global scale though, particularly in developing countries, it’s part of economies and that’s the product of large population increases over the last 50 years, migration issues — it’s those people that are most vulnerable.”
But times are changing. Under Britain’s Modern Slavery Act, companies operating in the U.K. with total revenue of 36 million pounds (C$66 million) or more must now disclose what they have done to ensure slave labour is not in their supply chains.
More than 12,000 companies are impacted by the act, said Villa, “and there are clear potential brand and reputational damages in failing to comply.”
U.S. President Barack Obama signed a bill recently barring the import of goods produced by forced labour from entering the United States. And in Brazil, the ministry of labour is fining Brazilian companies for using slave labour.
What should employers, HR be doing?
To combat the scourge of slavery, there are several steps employers and HR in particular can take, according to the experts.
Firstly, employers need to understand, through the multiple layers of their supply chain, what’s going on, said Morris.
“In the global economy... you have to understand who you’re doing business with, you have to understand who touches your supply chain. And that sounds easier said than done. Most employers can definitely understand it down to probably the second layer. Where it becomes murkier is the layers underneath that.”
Secondly, they have to make sure employees are providing information if they think something inappropriate is happening, so that’s about putting your core values out on the table, he said.
“You have to educate them... because the headquarters could have the best technology in the world, but if the people that are truly at ground zero are not trained correctly on what to look for and when to report it and to feel empowered to report it — because often there’s a lot of fear that goes on here — then that’s not going to get fixed.”
It’s also about encouraging employees to have a social impact, said Morris, “actually living it as a social value that comes from, and that tone is set, from the very top of the organization. That one may sound a little touchy feely but that’s what will make the most long and lasting impact in an organization, that’s where people will go the extra mile to make sure they understand the fourth and fifth level of a supply chain and that they put fear aside or cultural bias aside and raise their hand when something inappropriate is going on.”
As an example, it was reported recently an HR person at a food manufacturing plant in the U.K. noticing something odd with two employees and flagged the relevant authorities, said Mike Reed, an associate at Gowling WLG in London, U.K.
It turned out their wages were going to a trafficker, so they were working in servitude.
“(It’s about) knowing that, within a country like the U.K., these sorts of things are happening in various part of the country, and it’s something that we can’t simply ignore… and having a bit of training around that helps broaden that awareness within the organization.”
Companies need to push the issue from the top of the supply chain all the way down to the bottom, said Reed.
“That includes the people who are involved in that sub-contracting and intermediate production steps and raw material and commodity provisions.”
And in annual procurement officer training, companies need to talk about this with the teams.
“When they do site visits, they need to talk about looking at who’s on the shop floor or who’s in the mine, and not just on the quality of product coming out of that mine or that factory, and understand the working conditions for those individuals there,” he said.
“Slavery is a little trickier than say fire safety or other kinds of things that say a Canadian or an American site inspector might just be able to eyeball because it’s about how people came to do that job and whether they can leave, and not just whether there’s adequate fire safety here or adequate meal breaks… it’s a little bit trickier for the due diligence side.”
HR has an important role to play in making sure this is embedded within an organization in terms of policy, said Anna Fletcher, director at Gowling WLG in London, U.K.
“I see HR’s role as being very much responsible for all policies and procedures to highlight the organization’s approach to this. And that would involve HR working in conjunction with your compliance teams, your procurement teams, risk teams and so on so it is completely embedded. But it’s not just one department responsible for one section of this, it’s a much more joined-up approach so we can ensure as well that if we’re going to encourage people to report concerns, there’s a reporting mechanism in place.”
U.K. employers are setting up sub-teams or sub-committees with a representative from each of the key parts of the business co-ordinating the approach, so that stops it being siloed, she said. Training is also important, so the people who need to know about this really know the ins and outs of the legislation.
“That’s not necessarily something that every employee needs to be aware of but there will need to be a wider awareness within the business and, again, it would seem to be me this is about people, and therefore that dissemination of information would fall to HR to deal with,” said Fletcher.
© Copyright Canadian HR Reporter, Thomson Reuters Canada Limited. All rights reserved.