Toronto mayor example of how not to handle a sexual harassment charge
Local politics in any city can be a bit of a circus act. I know — city council was my beat in my early days as a journalist.
But local government in Toronto has elevated the three- ring act to new heights. To say that the mayor’s office in Canada’s largest city has been controversial since Mayor Rob Ford was elected is an understatement.
Pick a controversy — there’s a good chance the mayor’s office has dealt with it. Depending on what side of the political spectrum you fall, Toronto’s right-wing mayor is either a bumbling idiot or a saviour who is finally respecting taxpayer dollars after years of waste.
But regardless of where you sit on said spectrum, and particularly through an HR lens, the way Ford has reacted to an allegation of sexual harassment against him is problematic.
Here’s the Reader’s Digest version of events for those not familiar with the case, particularly readers outside Toronto where it made big headlines: Earlier this month, Ford attended a party held by a Jewish political group. In attendance was Sarah Thomson, a well-known figure in the city and someone who ran against Ford for the mayor’s seat in the last election.
Thomson and Ford posed for a photo at the event, and she alleged — via a Facebook post — that Ford groped her and made suggestive comments.
One can question the wisdom of laying such a charge via social media, but in an age where anyone can post anything to a mass audience at any time, it’s a hardly surprising — though regrettable — knee-jerk reaction.
But one can’t question the wisdom of Ford’s inappropriate response. Here’s what he said on a radio show he regularly hosts: “I’ve always said I don’t know if she’s playing with a full deck.”
Denying the accusation is one thing. At the moment, only two people really know what happened — Ford and Thomson — and they’re telling different stories. It’s impossible to objectively know who is telling the truth.
But, in a sexual harassment allegation, it’s never a smart move to try to sway opinion by questioning the accuser’s sanity. Politics is a different animal than corporate life, but that’s a tactic that could lead to a pretty expensive judgment if a CEO or business leader tried it out.
In a statement to the media, also posted on Facebook, Thomson said the following in response:
“Decades ago, powerful men who sexually assaulted women would call them ‘hysterical’ or ‘crazy’ to debase their credibility. It pushed many assaulted women into silence. Today Mayor Ford stated he wondered if I was ‘playing with a full deck’ to try to discredit me. He will not push me into silence and I hope his accusations do not reignite the old fears that once silenced women.”
Charges of sexual harassment should never be taken lightly. They require a full investigation into any alleged wrongdoing, sometimes by third-party professionals.
But the last reaction any leader should have is to try and discredit the accuser. There’s nothing wrong with strongly denying it happened, if that’s the case, or laying out a solid case in your defence.
But name-calling? That’s not even acceptable on the playground.
On the blogs
If you haven’t been to www.hrreporter.com in awhile, you’re missing out on some great content.
Your subscription to Canadian HR Reporter entitles you to unlimited access to the online archive, featuring more than 15,000 articles dating back to 2000.
Plus there are hundreds of videos, on-demand webinars and we have seven bloggers writing weekly columns. Here’s a sampling of recent blog entries:
You’re fired: Now don’t forget to tidy your room: Even where there is just cause for dismissal, the employee/tenant may have a right to remain at the employer-provided accommodations for four weeks or more, says Canadian HR law blogger Stuart Rudner.
Degrees becoming standard job requirement: Changes to pay, recruiting strategies, job documentation may also be needed, says compensation blogger Claudine Kapel.
Do ‘HiPPOs’ make the best decisions?: HR polices and practices blogger Brian Kreissl outlines the pros and cons of relying too much on the highest paid person’s opinion.