FLS Transportation Services Limited v. TRAFFIX Group Inc.

Firms involved

Stikeman Elliott LLP, Unrepresented
FLS Transportation Services Limited
Law Firm
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Lawyer(s)

Angela Crimeni

Dylan Bell

Jenna Velji

TRAFFIX Group Inc.
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Craig Swain
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Jack Heu
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Michelle Spannier
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Iliyaaz Ali
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Graham Eastwood
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Denise Mannette
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Wilson Shing
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Hannah Gale
Law Firm
Unrepresented
William Sun
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Wilson Lee
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Sean Lowry
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Aatif Agloria
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Emma Chu
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Maria Fernanda Duarte Chacon
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Manuel David Ortiz Alvarez
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Hayley Rawle
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Zireen Shabnam Bibi
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Mary-Anne Trinh
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Haylee Mills
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Carolina Lacerda Pereira Goncalves
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Isis Roxana Zamudio Ibanez
Law Firm
Unrepresented
Ken Boyington
Law Firm
Unrepresented

Background: FLS Transportation Services Limited, the plaintiff, sued TRAFFIX Group Inc., and several former employees including Craig Swain, Jack Heu, and others. The lawsuit centered on alleged breaches of employment duties and the misuse of confidential information by the defendants.

Key Legal Issues: FLS claimed the defendants breached their employment contracts by resigning en masse without proper notice. The plaintiff also alleged that the defendants misused FLS’s confidential information, which they transmitted to personal devices and used to solicit FLS clients. Furthermore, FLS accused the defendants of a coordinated conspiracy to harm FLS by joining TRAFFIX and exploiting its confidential information.

Held: The court granted an Anton Piller order, allowing for the search and seizure of data from the defendants’ devices to preserve evidence.

Costs/Damages Awarded: FLS was awarded costs and damages amounting to CAD 2.5 million in favor of the successful party.

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S243885
Labour & Employment Law
$ 2,500,000
Other