NOV Enerflow ULC v Maude

Firms involved

Dentons Canada LLP, Koskie Glavin Gordon LLP
NOV Enerflow ULC
Law Firm
Dentons Canada LLP
Lawyer(s)

Tari M. Hiebert

Jon Maude
Law Firm
Koskie Glavin Gordon LLP
Lawyer(s)

Michelle De Cambra

Key Points:

  • Nature of the Case: Statutory appeal from a Human Rights Commission decision.
  • Initial Ruling: The Human Rights Commission found NOV discriminated against Mr. Maude, violating section 7 of the Alberta Human Rights Act, and awarded damages.
  • Section 7 Violation: Prohibits employment discrimination based on various personal characteristics, including disability.

Background:

  • Employment and Policy: Mr. Maude, a Journeyman Millwright Assembler at NOV since 2010, was subject to periodic drug tests under NOV’s Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy.
  • Incident: A March 2016 test indicated "non-negative" for cocaine. Mr. Maude admitted to using cocaine days before the test but denied any job performance impact or substance abuse disorder.
  • Assessment: Referred to Lifeworks for evaluation, resulting in a recommendation for residential treatment, which Mr. Maude contested.

Tribunal Findings:

  • Prima Facie Discrimination: Established as Mr. Maude was not allowed to continue employment due to a substance abuse disability.
  • Meiorin Test Application: NOV's policy was valid, but its execution was flawed. The Tribunal felt alternatives to residential treatment, such as a day program, were not considered.

Appeal Court Decision:

  • Errors Identified:
    • Tribunal lacked evidence to support that a day treatment was a valid alternative.
    • Mr. Maude failed to provide evidence for his preferred accommodation.
    • Tribunal's conclusions were not based on the provided evidence, constituting a palpable and overriding error.
  • Outcome: The appeal was allowed, overturning the discrimination ruling against NOV.

Conclusion:

  • Result: No discrimination was found against Mr. Maude.
  • Next Steps: Costs to be determined.
  • The document did not specify any monetary award.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
1901 16582
Labour & Employment Law
Applicant