1731271 Alberta Inc v Reimer

Firms involved

Stephens Mah Toogood (SMT Legal), Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
1731271 Alberta Inc operating as Imperial Printing
Law Firm
Stephens Mah Toogood (SMT Legal)
Lawyer(s)

Roger C. Stephens

Angie Reimer
Law Firm
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Lawyer(s)

Bruce Graham

Victoria Baylis

Westkey Graphics Ltd.
Law Firm
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Lawyer(s)

Bruce Graham

Victoria Baylis

Key Points:

  • Nature of Case:
    • Imperial Printing sought an interlocutory injunction against former employee Angie Reimer and her current employer Westkey Graphics Ltd.
    • Alleged breach of fiduciary duty and misappropriation of property.
  • Imperial Printing’s Claims:
    • Ms. Reimer, a key employee (fiduciary), allegedly enticed customers to Westkey, causing financial losses.
    • Sought to prevent Ms. Reimer and Westkey from soliciting its clients for one year.
    • Claimed Ms. Reimer took client-related property for Westkey’s benefit.
  • Respondents' Defense:
    • Ms. Reimer was not a fiduciary and did not breach any duty.
    • Any losses were not due to Ms. Reimer’s actions and could be compensated by damages.
    • Ms. Reimer provided an explanation for possessing the PCL material.
  • Court’s Analysis:
    • Existence of Fiduciary Duty:
      • Ms. Reimer’s role did not meet fiduciary criteria as she lacked independent authority or discretion over business operations.
      • Being a valuable employee does not establish fiduciary status.
    • Alleged Breach:
      • No strong prima facie case of improper client solicitation.
      • Emails notifying former clients of her new job did not constitute solicitation.
      • Evidence did not support claims of misappropriation or misuse of confidential information.
    • Irreparable Harm:
      • Imperial Printing failed to show irreparable harm that could not be compensated by damages.
    • Balance of Convenience:
      • Favored the respondents as preventing customer choice is not in the public interest.
      • Imperial Printing’s case was weak regarding fiduciary duty breach.
  • Result:
    • Application for an interlocutory injunction was dismissed.
    • No monetary awards or costs ordered.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2403 09977
Labour & Employment Law
Respondent