OPSEU v. Ontario

Firms involved

Ryder Wright Holmes Bryden Nam LLP, Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario, Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP
ONTARIO PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES UNION
Law Firm
Ryder Wright Holmes Bryden Nam LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Wright

Laura Johnson

Behzad Akhkend

R.M. KENNEDY
Law Firm
Ryder Wright Holmes Bryden Nam LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Wright

Laura Johnson

Behzad Akhkend

J.P. HORNICK
Law Firm
Ryder Wright Holmes Bryden Nam LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Wright

Laura Johnson

Behzad Akhkend

THE CROWN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO as represented by THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO
Law Firm
Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario
Lawyer(s)

Rochelle Fox

Sean Hanley

Sean Kissick

COLLEGE EMPLOYER COUNCIL
Law Firm
Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP
Lawyer(s)

Frank J. Cesario

Eleanor A. Vaughan

Danika L. Winkel

Background:

  • The Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Labour Dispute Resolution Act, 2017 ended a 5-week strike by academic staff at 24 Ontario colleges.
  • OPSEU claimed the Act violated their members’ rights under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (freedom of association).

Key Points:

  1. Strike Details:
    • Started October 16, 2017, affecting 19,000 employees and about 336,400 students.
  2. Legislation:
    • Required the strike to end and referred disputes to binding arbitration.
    • OPSEU sought to invalidate the Act and sought damages under the Charter.
  3. Arguments:
    • Applicants: The Act unjustifiably infringed on meaningful collective bargaining.
    • Respondent: Any infringement was justified under section 1 of the Charter, citing the need to protect students’ education.
  4. Court Analysis:
    • The court evaluated if the Act substantially interfered with collective bargaining.
    • It found the Act did interfere but justified this due to the pressing need to resume education and minimize harm to students.
  5. Decision:
    • The Act did not infringe section 2(d) of the Charter.
    • Even if it did, the infringement was justified under section 1 due to the significant impact on students.
  6. Costs:
    • OPSEU to pay Ontario $100,000 in costs, no costs awarded to or from the Intervenor.

Conclusion:

  • The court upheld the Act, finding no Charter infringement or justified infringement, emphasizing the need to protect students’ educational interests.

 

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-18-00590573-0000
Labour & Employment Law
$ 100,000
Respondent