PTW Canada Ltd v Smith

Firms involved

Billington Barristers, Mathews, Dinsdale & Clark LLP, Anderson Morin LLP, CASlaw, Miles Davison LLP
PTW Canada Ltd
Law Firm
Billington Barristers
Lawyer(s)

Richard N. Billington, K.C.

Law Firm
Mathews, Dinsdale & Clark LLP
Lawyer(s)

Lori Brienza

Brett Smith
Law Firm
Anderson Morin LLP
Lawyer(s)

Norman D. Anderson

Law Firm
CASlaw
Lawyer(s)

Clifford Andrew Sukhai

Vital Controls Inc
Law Firm
Miles Davison LLP
Lawyer(s)

Todd Lee

Jayson Pancoast
Law Firm
Anderson Morin LLP
Lawyer(s)

Norman D. Anderson

Law Firm
CASlaw
Lawyer(s)

Clifford Andrew Sukhai

Overview:

  • Incident: In April 2022, Brett Smith and Jayson Pancoast ended their association with PTW Canada Ltd.
  • Allegation: PTW suspects Smith and Pancoast took confidential information and conspired with Vital Controls Inc. to compete unfairly.

Claims:

  • Accusations: Breach of contractual, common law, and fiduciary obligations, unfair competition, conspiracy, and misappropriation of corporate opportunities.

Procedural History:

  • Initial Action: PTW obtained an Ex-Parte Anton Piller Order (APO) for search and seizure.
  • Findings: Evidence found led to further legal actions. The APO’s search provisions were later removed, but injunctions remained.

Application:

  • Discovery Process: PTW sought complete production of records from Smith and Pancoast, proposing ISS oversight, which was deemed novel.

Assessment:

  • Court’s View: Defendants inadequately identified relevant records. A thorough review and disclosure are required, including seized documents.

Disposition:

  • Order: Defendants must provide complete Affidavits of Records within 120 days.
  • ISS Role Rejected: The court opted for conventional litigation processes, emphasizing cost efficiency.

Costs:

  • Award: PTW awarded $1500 in costs from each respondent (this totals $4,500), payable within sixty days, with higher costs for non-compliance.

 

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2201 05725
Labour & Employment Law
$ 4,500
Applicant