Elzayat v. Rogers Communication

Firms involved

Self Represented, DLA Piper (Canada) LLP
HAYTHAM ELZAYAT
Law Firm
Self Represented
ROGERS COMMUNICATION
Law Firm
DLA Piper (Canada) LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stephanie Kolla

Key Points:

  1. Background:
    • In 2015, Haytham Elzayat attended a job interview at Rogers, where he was allegedly asked discriminatory questions regarding his ethnicity and religion.
    • Elzayat filed a lawsuit claiming discrimination.
  2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss:
    • Rogers argued the lawsuit was barred by a two-year limitation period under the Limitations Act, 2002 and a release signed by Elzayat in a 2018 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal case.
    • Rogers also contended that discrimination claims should be filed with the Tribunal, not the court.
  3. Court's Analysis and Decision:
    • Jurisdiction: The court determined it lacked jurisdiction to grant damages for discrimination, as there is no common law tort for discrimination. The matter falls under human rights legislation.
    • Limitation Period: The action was barred by the expiration of the two-year limitation period. Elzayat failed to prove incapacity due to disability or homelessness that would toll the limitation period.
    • Release: The release signed at the Tribunal was found not to apply to the 2015 interview; however, this was moot given the court’s other findings.
  4. Outcome:
    • The court dismissed Elzayat's action on all grounds.
    • Costs were awarded to Rogers in the amount of $20,000.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-00690473-0000
Labour & Employment Law
$ 20,000
Defendant