Badger Infrastructure v Parent-Walker

Firms involved

DLA Piper (Canada) LLP, Hudson Sinclair LLP, Levitt LLP
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
Law Firm
DLA Piper (Canada) LLP
Lawyer(s)

Heather L. Treacy

Jordan Deering

Jason Parent-Walker
Law Firm
Hudson Sinclair LLP
Lawyer(s)

Alex Sinclair

Sarah Maude

Law Firm
Levitt LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jarret Janis

Ontario Excavac Inc., COB, OE Utility Services
Law Firm
Hudson Sinclair LLP
Lawyer(s)

Alex Sinclair

Sarah Maude

Law Firm
Levitt LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jarret Janis

The case Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. v. Parent-Walker, 2024 ABKB 550 revolves around a legal dispute between Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (Badger) and Jason Parent-Walker, a former employee, along with Ontario Excavac Inc. (OE), his new employer. Badger alleges that Parent-Walker breached contractual obligations by soliciting its employees and customers, and OE conspired in these breaches. Badger sought an interim injunction to prevent these actions pending trial.

Key points:

  • Employment Background: Parent-Walker was terminated by Badger in September 2023 and joined OE in November 2023, a competitor in the hydrovac excavation market.

  • Allegations: Badger claims that Parent-Walker violated non-solicitation agreements and misused confidential information. OE was accused of conspiring and benefiting from these breaches.

  • Jurisdiction: The court established jurisdiction based on Parent-Walker’s employment contract, which specified Alberta courts.

  • Waiver and Estoppel: The court found that Badger had waived its right to enforce non-solicitation and non-competition clauses through a communication in November 2023, where Badger’s lawyer stated they would not enforce such covenants. This waiver, and the doctrine of promissory estoppel, precluded Badger from enforcing these obligations.

  • Confidential Information: Badger failed to prove that Parent-Walker misused confidential information.

  • Ruling: Badger’s application for an interim injunction was dismissed, as it did not establish a strong prima facie case or serious issues for trial.

  • No monetary award was specified.

Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2401 08762
Labour & Employment Law
Defendant