Gu v. Unifor Local 40

Firms involved

Self Represented, Unifor, Not specified, Ontario Labour Relations Board
YAN GU
Law Firm
Self Represented
UNIFOR, UNIFOR LOCAL 40
Law Firm
Unifor
Lawyer(s)

Farah Baloo

CULTURELINK SETTLEMENT AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
Law Firm
Not specified
ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD
Law Firm
Ontario Labour Relations Board
Lawyer(s)

Andrea Bowker

Background:

  • Ms. Gu was hired by CultureLink in 2019 on a temporary contract and obtained a permanent role in 2020.
  • In 2021, she was laid off when a senior employee exercised bumping rights under the collective agreement.
  • She requested Unifor to file an individual grievance arguing she should retain full seniority from her original hire date.
  • Unifor declined, filing a policy grievance instead, which allowed Ms. Gu to retain employment in a different role with a salary increase.
  • Ms. Gu challenged Unifor’s decision internally, but Unifor maintained its stance.
  • In 2023, she filed a duty of fair representation complaint under s. 74 of the Labour Relations Act with the OLRB, which was dismissed without a hearing in February 2024.
  • A request for reconsideration was denied in April 2024.

Court’s Findings:

  1. Jurisdiction: The OLRB correctly declined jurisdiction over discrimination claims related to Unifor’s internal processes or employer actions.
  2. Fair Representation: Unifor’s refusal to file an individual grievance was not arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith, as unions have discretion in grievance handling (Gagnon).
  3. Key Allegations: The refusal to allow a Zoom meeting to be recorded, a comment about lacking grievance grounds, and internal appeal delays did not prove discrimination.
  4. Procedural Fairness: Summary dismissal was permissible under OLRB rules and not unfair, as extensive written submissions were considered.
  5. Reconsideration Decision: Upheld as reasonable since the initial decision was sound.

Conclusion:

The application was dismissed, and Ms. Gu was ordered to pay Unifor $2,000 in costs?.

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
306/24
Labour & Employment Law
$ 2,000
Respondent