Employees coming to work in extreme weather conditions

Keeping the office open when the roads are dangerous

Stuart Rudner

Question: Could an employer face any liability if it stays open during very bad weather conditions for which authorities recommend staying home and an employee gets in a serious accident trying to get into work?

Answer: As readers will know, employers have certain duties to ensure the safety of their employees while they are at work. These duties have been augmented recently in various jurisdictions, such as Ontario, which has resulted in an increased focus upon employee safety and, in particular, the prevention of violence, harassment and bullying. That said, generally speaking, an employer is not responsible for ensuring an employee’s safe passage to and from her place of work. Different principles may apply when an employee is asked to travel to different locations, either locally or globally, in the course of their duties. However, employees are still ultimately responsible for getting to and from work safely in most situations.

In the hypothetical situation described in the question, there are dangerous conditions. However, as most Canadians know, conditions can vary greatly from one neighbourhood to another. During our recent winter, I was in London, Ont., during a snow and ice storm that made the roads particularly treacherous. At the same time, the roads in Markham, Ont., where I base my practice, were not particularly dangerous.

While an employer may choose to keep its business open based on conditions in the immediate area, employees may encounter dangerous conditions getting there. On any day, be it a beautiful sunny day or a day on which we experience a severe winter storm, employees will have to determine for themselves whether they can safely make it to work. If they can’t, and assuming their employer is open for business that day, they will have a duty to report their tardiness or absence. Assuming they are not blameworthy, and there are no questions regarding the validity of their explanation or any other ongoing concerns regarding absenteeism or tardiness, they should not expect to be subject to discipline.

To answer the specific question posed, a successful claim against the employer in the hypothetical situation described is unlikely. That said, cases of that nature are decided based upon their own particular facts and circumstances. If it could be shown, for example, that the employer was negligent in deciding to remain open, or insisted the employee attend at work despite knowledge — actual or implied — that it would be particularly dangerous, it could face potential liability. In such circumstances, and as indicated above, it would be incumbent upon the employee to indicate that she does not think it would be safe for her to attend at work. In response, I would advise employers to be cautious. Mandating, or even encouraging, an employee to come in despite her concerns could result in liability if the employee were ultimately injured. While an employer is entitled to remain open despite adverse weather or other conditions, it should always be mindful of dangers or concerns an employee may raise and should be particularly cautious in how it responds to any such concerns. If the employer does not behave unreasonably, it is unlikely it would face any particular liability.

Stuart Rudner is a partner in Miller Thomson LLP’s Labour and Employment Group in Toronto. He can be reached at (416) 595-8672 or [email protected].

Latest stories