Worker’s dishonesty muddles duty to accommodate injury

Employer had evidence that should have quelled suspicions about worker’s injury, but employee didn’t help his case by exaggerating

An Ontario company should have relied on medical information rather than surveillance of an employee off work with an injury, despite the employee being less than forthright with his status, an arbitrator has ruled.

To read the full story, login below.

Not a subscriber?

Start your subscription today!