Services industry saw greatest increase
Productivity — a measure of how much is produced for each hour worked — rose 0.5 per cent in the fourth quarter of last year, beating the market forecast of a 0.2 per cent gain and just slightly below the U.S. 0.6 perc ent gain.
For the year as a whole, Canadian productivity increased 1.4 per cent but lagged the comparable U.S. rate of 3.8 per cent.
"Productivity growth in Canada still trails that of the United States significantly," said Scotia Capital economists Derek Holt, Gorica Djeric and Sarah Howcroft in a note to clients.
"Given that Canada has fully recovered job losses suffered during the downturn, GDP growth will be reliant on productivity picking up going forward," they said.
Productivity has been weighing on the Bank of Canada as it keeps interest-rate rises on hold pending further proof the economic recovery is entrenched.
On March 1, 2011, the bank cited "Canada's poor relative productivity performance" and currency appreciation as the two main factors hampering an export recovery, which would rely heavily on U.S. demand. Central bank research shows the Canada-U.S. productivity gap widening in recent years.
Canadian businesses expanded output by 0.9 per cent in the fourth quarter, while the number of hours worked rose 0.4 per cent.
The services industry saw productivity jump 0.8 per cent, outpacing the goods-producing industries for the first time since late 2009, with retail trade, wholesale trade and finance leading the way. The goods-producing sector recorded a 0.3 per cent drop.
The sharp appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar made Canadian businesses appear less competitive than their U.S. counterparts in terms of production costs.
When measured in U.S. dollars, Canadian labor costs per unit leaped 3.2 per cent in the fourth quarter versus a 0.1 per cent decline for U.S. businesses. In 2010 as a whole, Canadian labor costs ballooned by 11.1 per cent, while costs fell 1.5 per cent south of the border.
Scotia Capital said data so far suggest the possibility of a weaker productivity reading in the first quarter of this year because of a decline in hours worked.