Termination of unco-operative worker not considered failure to accommodate

'If you're going to say an employee was unreasonable, then you have to demonstrate you are reasonable'

Termination of unco-operative worker not considered failure to accommodate

“It’s a misconception that an employer has to almost obey what an employee wishes or wants when [the employee] is disabled,” says Sharaf Sultan, principal of Sultan Lawyers in Toronto. “In reality, an employer's obligation is to attempt to maintain employment, to provide enough work for that person, and achieve the same income level as they did before.”

To read the full story, login below.

Not a subscriber?

Start your subscription today!